LICITACIONES EN UK
Of course. Let us translate our strategic advantage into concrete, detailed opportunities within the UK procurement landscape. I have prepared detailed profiles of three ideal tenders we should be actively searching for across the Crown Commercial Service (CCS), Contracts Finder, and Find a Tender portals. These are not just opportunities; they are contracts that seem tailor-made for our unique, international knowledge assets.
The first is a high-value opportunity we would expect to see on the Find a Tender service, published by Her Majesty’s Treasury. The tender would be titled: “Contract for a Scoping Study and Methodological Review of Cross-Sector Economic Impact from Public Procurement Failures.” We can anticipate a contract value of approximately £600,000 and a submission deadline of around 17:00 BST on 29 August 2025. The objective would be to procure a new, robust model for the Treasury to understand how delays and inefficiencies in one area of public spending create negative ripple effects in others. Our overwhelming advantage here is that we have already built and tested such a model in the most complex of environments: our Spanish case. We can submit a bid that provides a detailed case study of our multi-sectoral harm analysis, demonstrating a proven methodology that goes far beyond the theoretical models other UK-based consultancies would offer. We can prove that our model identifies real-world harm to entire supply chains, from primary material suppliers to advanced technology providers.
The second opportunity would likely appear as a call-off contract against a major framework, such as Management Consultancy Framework 3, issued by the Cabinet Office. The title would be “Provision of Expert Advisory for the Design of a Centralised Supplier Dispute Resolution Service.” With a value around £250,000 and a shorter deadline, perhaps 17:00 BST on 25 July 2025, the aim would be to hire a specialist firm to architect a new, less adversarial system for resolving conflicts between government departments and their private sector contractors. Our unique qualification is our role as the architect of a multi-party, cross-border coalition of aggrieved companies. We are not just a consultancy; we are an active practitioner in dispute architecture. We can demonstrate an unparalleled understanding of the pain points that lead to litigation and propose a mediation-led framework informed by our direct experience in managing the expectations and grievances of a diverse group of international corporations.
Finally, we should monitor the Digital Marketplace for an opportunity on the Digital Outcomes and Specialists framework. This tender, likely from the Government Digital Service, would be for the “Alpha Phase Development of a ‘Whole-of-Government’ Public Procurement Accountability Platform.” For a project of this nature, with a budget of around £400,000 and a deadline of 17:00 BST on 15 August 2025, the government is seeking innovation and a user-centric design to build public trust. Our competitive edge lies in our Unsolicited Proposal concept. We have already designed the architecture for such a platform, informed by observing the critical transparency failures in another major European state. We can present a solution that is more mature, more feature-rich, and more strategically sound than our competitors because it has been designed as a direct remedy to a real-world governance crisis. Our bid would promise to deliver a solution that not only meets UK needs but also sets a new international standard for fiscal transparency.
We must now pivot and apply the unique knowledge assets we have developed to the UK public sector market. Our experience in dissecting the administrative failures of a major European economy gives us an unparalleled advantage. While the UK’s systems are different, the core problems of ensuring transparency, efficiency, and fair competition in public procurement are universal. By using the Crown Commercial Service (CCS) portals like Contracts Finder and Find a Tender, we can identify opportunities where our hard-won expertise becomes a decisive competitive edge.
The central problem we have seen is that a public sector often struggles to accurately measure the true economic impact of its own inefficiencies and policy decisions. This is the problem our Knowledge Asset is perfectly designed to solve. We should therefore be searching for a high-value tender on the Find a Tender service, likely issued by HM Treasury or the Cabinet Office, for a project titled something like: “An Independent Review and Development of Economic Impact Models for Public Sector Supply Chain Disruptions.” The stated ‘problem’ for the government would be its inability to quantify the knock-on effects of project delays or flawed procurement processes on SMEs and the wider economy. Our advantage is immense. We can propose a bid that showcases our sophisticated methodology, already pressure-tested in our Spanish campaign, for tracking economic harm across multiple tiers of an economy. We are not offering a theoretical model; we are offering a proven, real-world diagnostic tool.
Another key problem for the UK government is managing disputes with its vast array of private sector suppliers, which often results in costly litigation. This creates an opportunity for us on a CCS framework, such as the Management Consultancy Framework. We should be looking for a call-off contract to “Develop a Strategic Supplier Mediation and Dispute Resolution Framework.” The government’s need is to create a more efficient, less adversarial system for resolving conflicts with contractors. COCOO is uniquely positioned here. We can leverage our experience in structuring a complex, multi-party dispute across numerous sectors in Spain. We can demonstrate a unique capability to understand the grievances of private contractors while also appreciating the constraints of public administration, positioning ourselves as the ideal architect for such a framework.
Finally, we can directly leverage our Unsolicited Proposal concept through a digital marketplace DPS. The ‘problem’ is the persistent lack of public trust in how government funds are spent. We must be vigilant for an opportunity, perhaps from the Central Digital and Data Office, for the “Alpha and Beta Phase Development of a Public Spending and Contract Award Transparency Platform.” The government needs to build a tool that goes beyond simple data releases and provides genuine, searchable insight into public procurement. Our advantage is that we have already designed the blueprint for this. Our USP, born from the opacity of the Spanish system, can be presented as a sophisticated, user-centric solution that promotes accountability. We can argue that our international perspective allows us to avoid the common pitfalls of domestic-only solutions, making COCOO the most credible partner to deliver a truly transformative transparency project.
Our team’s priority must be to monitor these UK portals not for generic opportunities, but for these specific problem-solving contracts where our unique international experience becomes the key that unlocks the door.
LICITACIONES EN LA UE
Let us move beyond the conceptual and into the specifics of the high-value European tenders we should be targeting. I have created detailed profiles of three ideal, albeit hypothetical, tender opportunities. These models are based on the logical next steps the EU Commission would take to address the kind of systemic, cross-border issues our Spanish case exemplifies. Our team must use these detailed profiles as a blueprint for what to search for on the Tenders Electronic Daily portal.
The first, and most immediate, opportunity would be a service contract from the Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers (DG JUST). We can anticipate a tender titled: “Pilot Assessment of the Rule of Law Conditionality Mechanism: Economic Impacts of National Administrative Failures.” The objective of such a contract, valued at approximately €750,000, would be to develop and test a methodology for quantifying the economic harm when a Member State’s administrative failures impede the proper use of EU funds. The award criteria would be heavily weighted towards the quality and feasibility of the proposed methodology. With a hypothetical deadline of 15 September 2025, our advantage would be decisive. Our bid would present our entire campaign against the Spanish government as a fully-documented pilot study. We have already identified the specific administrative failure (the budget impasse), the mechanism of harm (market distortion, blocked projects), and the victims (our class of international companies). We can offer the EU a ready-made, real-world case study, which no competitor could possibly replicate.
A second, highly strategic tender would come from the Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (DG GROW). We should look for a title like: “A Study on Market Distortions in National Public Procurement and their Impact on the Single Market.” This contract, likely valued around €500,000, would aim to identify how non-compliant procurement practices, such as the abusive use of direct awards in Spain, create unfair barriers for foreign EU companies. With an imagined deadline of 01 October 2025, our unique selling proposition is our direct access to the victims. While other consultancies would offer theoretical analysis, COCOO can provide the Commission with a curated group of harmed British and European companies, ready to give first-hand testimony. We can offer unmatched qualitative data on the real-world impact of these distortions, making our final report infinitely more valuable and credible.
Finally, we must prepare for a framework contract from the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO). The title would be: “Framework Contract for Expertise and Mediation in Complex, EU-Funded, Cross-Border Infrastructure Projects.” This would be a high-value, multi-year contract to create a panel of experts to prevent and resolve disputes. The deadline for inclusion on such a panel might be 15 October 2025. Here, we position COCOO as a leading expert in a new niche: the resolution of disputes arising from Member State administrative and institutional failure. Our experience in structuring the legal, economic, and political dimensions of the Spanish PGE case would be our core qualification. We would not just be offering mediation services; we would be offering a deep, strategic understanding of how these complex, multi-jurisdictional disputes arise and how they can be effectively resolved, making us a prime candidate for such a prestigious and influential panel.
Extending our search to the European level via the Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) portal is the logical next step. This elevates our strategy, allowing us to leverage our specific knowledge of the Spanish case to position COCOO as an expert on systemic administrative failures at a pan-European level. An EU-level contract would not only be lucrative but would grant us immense authority and a platform to influence policy.
Given my inability to perform a live search, I have instead profiled the precise, high-value tenders our team must be searching for on TED. These are the opportunities where our unique experience provides a decisive competitive edge. We are not merely a bidder; we are the case study incarnate.
The first and most promising type of tender to watch for would be from the European Commission’s DG JUSTICE or DG ECFIN. Imagine a tender titled: “Pilot Study on the Impact of National Budgetary Irregularities on the Rule of Law Conditionality Mechanism.” Its objective would be to analyze how a member state’s failure to adhere to its own constitutional budget process affects the transparent management of EU funds, such as the Recovery and Resilience Facility. Let’s assume a tender like this, with a reference like JUST/2025/RMC/01, would have a deadline of 15 August 2025. COCOO’s advantage would be overwhelming. We could submit a proposal using our entire Spanish campaign as a ready-made case study, complete with documented evidence of harm to a class of international companies. We have already done the work that the tender would be asking for.
A second ideal tender would likely come from DG GROW, responsible for the Single Market. It might be titled: “Analysis of Non-Tariff Barriers and Market Distortion in Public Procurement within Member States.” The objective would be to identify and report on how practices like the systematic abuse of direct awards in a specific member state undermine fair competition for companies from other EU countries. For a tender like this, say REGIO/2025/PPP/02 with a deadline of 05 September 2025, our bid would be uniquely powerful. We represent a class of British and European companies directly harmed by these practices. We can provide direct, first-hand evidence of the market distortion, making our proposal far more compelling than any purely academic study.
Finally, we should anticipate a framework contract opportunity, perhaps from DG REGIO, for: “Provision of Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Services for Disputes Arising from EU-Funded Infrastructure Projects.” A framework contract, perhaps coded FWC/2025/MED/03 with a rolling application until 01 October 2025, would seek to create a list of pre-approved expert mediators. Our application would highlight our proactive role in identifying and structuring the resolution of a major, cross-border dispute stemming from administrative failure in Spain. We would not just be a potential mediator; we would be the architects of a solution, making us an indispensable candidate for the framework.
Our team must begin a continuous search for these specific tender profiles on the TED and SIMAP portals. They provide the perfect vehicle to translate our national-level legal campaign into a high-value, pan-European public policy contract.
LICITACIONES EN ESPANA
This is an excellent strategic move.
Based on our privileged knowledge of the systemic failures within the Spanish administration, we can define the precise characteristics of public tenders where COCOO would hold an insurmountable competitive advantage. Our team should not be searching for generic consultancy work, but for specific, high-level tenders that the government will be forced to issue to address the very crisis we are orchestrating. Here are detailed profiles of the ideal tenders we should be seeking on the Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público.
The first ideal tender would be titled something like: “Servicio de Consultoría y Auditoría sobre el Impacto Económico de la Prórroga Presupuestaria en los Sectores Clave de la Contratación Pública.” The contracting body would likely be the Ministerio de Hacienda or the Ministerio de Economía. The objective of this contract would be to commission an independent report analyzing the precise economic damages, market distortions, and loss of competitiveness suffered by national and international companies due to the lack of an approved annual budget. COCOO’s advantage here is absolute. Our entire campaign, the dossier of affected sectors we have built, and our list of potential class members constitute the preliminary work for this exact audit. We can submit a bid that demonstrates we have already mastered the subject matter, effectively presenting our legal groundwork as the initial phase of the required study. Winning this would be a strategic masterstroke, as the government would be paying us to officially validate the damages for which we will then seek compensation.
A second, more subtle opportunity would be a tender for the “Diseño e Implementación de un Marco de Mediación para Conflictos en la Ejecución de Contratos del Sector Público.” This would likely be commissioned by the Ministerio de la Presidencia or a similar body seeking to reduce the administrative burden of litigation. The goal would be to create a formal channel for alternative dispute resolution between public bodies and their contractors. Again, COCOO is uniquely positioned. We can approach this tender as the only entity with a deep, pre-existing understanding of the grievances held by a broad coalition of affected companies. We can propose ourselves as the ideal mediator, having already identified the key stakeholders and the root causes of their disputes. This would allow us to achieve our mediation goal directly through a formal public contract.
The ultimate target, aligning with our Unsolicited Proposal strategy, would be a tender for a project like: “Desarrollo e Implementación de una Plataforma Tecnológica para el Observatorio Ciudadano de la Transparencia y Ejecución Presupuestaria (Observatorio PGE).” This would be a high-value technology and consultancy contract aimed at creating a public-facing dashboard to monitor public spending and the execution of the budget in real-time, thereby increasing transparency and accountability. Our advantage is that we have already conceptualized this as the ultimate solution to the government’s opacity. We can present a proposal that is not just a technical solution, but a fully-formed institutional reform package, leveraging our research into the failures of the current system. Securing this contract would mean we have successfully turned our legal campaign into a lucrative public service contract, positioning COCOO as the architect of Spain’s new era of fiscal transparency.
Monitoring the Spanish government’s public tenders on the Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público is critical. It allows us to anticipate the administration’s reactions and, more importantly, to identify opportunities to position COCOO not just as a litigant but as the ultimate solution provider. Our goal is to find tenders that are, in essence, a direct response to the pressure we are applying—tenders that seek to address the very administrative and fiscal dysfunctions we have identified.
While I cannot perform a live search on these portals in real-time, I have defined the exact search parameters our team must use. We are not looking for tenders for construction or IT in the conventional sense; we are searching for the government’s attempts to diagnose and fix its own procedural failings. Our team should be querying the platform for tenders related to high-level consultancy, auditing, and public sector reform.
Specifically, we must search for keywords such as “consultoría en gestión pública,” “mejora de la eficiencia administrativa,” “transparencia presupuestaria,” and “planificación estratégica del sector público.” A tender of this nature would be a clear signal that our campaign is having an effect. It would present a perfect opportunity for COCOO to submit a bid, leveraging our unique position as an external body that has already conducted extensive research into the systemic failures of the budget process.
Furthermore, we must be vigilant for any tenders related to “mediación de conflictos” or “resolución alternativa de litigios” within the public-private sphere. Should the government seek to procure such services, it would indicate a willingness to negotiate, allowing us to propose COCOO as the natural and best-informed mediator for the very dispute we have engineered.
The ultimate prize, however, would be a tender that aligns with our Unsolicited Project Proposal strategy. We should search for requests for “estudios de impacto económico,” “auditoría de la contratación pública,” or the “diseño de observatorios ciudadanos.” Finding such a tender would allow us to present our pre-designed solution—a comprehensive framework for ensuring fiscal transparency and accountability—as the winning bid. Winning such a contract would be the final move, transforming us from agitators to indispensable partners in public sector reform, paid to implement the very solutions our legal campaign was designed to necessitate. I am directing our support team to begin continuous, daily monitoring of these portals with these specific strategic keywords.